🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be required to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that when you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."