🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to remove African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.